![]() ![]() Groups like the Giniw Collective, Camp Migizi, Honor the Earth, and the RISE Coalition staged dozens of protests attended by thousands of people in the first four months of construction. Outside the courts, Indigenous-led groups have organized opposition to Line 3, delaying construction along the pipeline route through non-violent direct action and protest. A ruling is expected on the appeals in June 2021 which could lead to a revocation of Enbridge's permits for construction. ![]() The plaintiffs brought forth several challenges to the pipeline, most notably questioning whether the energy transfer company had ever proved that there would be enough continued demand for tar sands oil to justify construction of Line 3. In March 2021, the Minnesota Court of Appeals heard testimony from Enbridge, the PUC, and appealing parties. Several parties, including Ojibwe tribes, environmental organizations, and the Minnesota Department of Commerce, are still appealing the project in court. Ongoing opposition following final permit approval The pipeline expansion became operational on 1 October 2021. However, the pipeline still faced significant resistance until its completion in September 2021. The Biden administration supported the pipeline. Įnbridge began construction of the new Line 3 oil pipeline across northern Minnesota in December 2020, shortly after final permits were issued. Although several of the pipeline's main permits were still facing appeals in court, regulatory agencies had granted the remaining permits to Enbridge to begin construction by November 2020. The permits for this project have been consistently contested by Indigenous communities, environmental justice organizations, and the Minnesota Department of Commerce. Īs of December 2020, Minnesota state and federal regulators had granted Enbridge all of the permits required to construct the last stretch of the Line 3 pipeline through Minnesota. Nevertheless, in June 2018 the PUC approved Enbridge's modified route and granted the Certificate of Need and Route Permit, both necessary permits for the project. Of the nearly 70,000 individual comments submitted, 68,244, or 94%, were in opposition. Most feedback they received opposed the pipeline. ![]() In 2018, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) solicited public input about the project. Enbridge agreed to a new route for the replacement line, avoiding more sensitive watersheds and some Native American reservations. The permitting process has been more complicated in Minnesota where climate justice organizations, Native American groups, and government agencies have resisted the project. Construction of the new Line 3 was completed everywhere but Minnesota by November 2020. By 2016, governing bodies in Canada, North Dakota, and Wisconsin had approved their segments of the pipeline. That multi-billion dollar project would allow Enbridge to restore their historic operating capacity and move nearly 800,000 barrels of oil per day. Due to concerns of the aging pipeline, and its leaks and spills, in 2014, Enbridge announced plans to build a replacement Line 3 pipeline. Resulting concerns about the safety of the pipeline have led Enbridge to reduce the amount of oil transported daily and propose the construction of a new pipeline. Structural deformities, including numerous cracks and holes have developed along the pipeline over time. People protesting the Line 3 pipeline at the Minnesota capitol building in 2018. ![]() Permitting and construction of the new pipeline has met with resistance from Native American communities and climate justice groups. The replacement pipeline has been completed in Canada, Wisconsin, North Dakota, and Minnesota. In 2014 Enbridge proposed the construction of a new pipeline segment along a different route in Minnesota which would increase the volume of oil that could be transported. Over its history, the pipeline has been the source of millions of gallons of oil spills, including a 1991 oil spill in Grand Rapids, Minnesota, that was the worst inland oil spill in U.S. Operating since 1968, it runs 1,031 miles (1,659 km) from Hardisty, Alberta, Canada to Superior, Wisconsin, United States.Ĭoncerns about the safety of the pipeline led Enbridge to reduce its capacity. The Line 3 pipeline is an oil pipeline owned by the Canadian multinational Enbridge. Oil pipeline and subject of climate resistance Line 3 Pipeline ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |